The purpose of this website 

​The purpose of this website is to leverage economics to dig deeper into understanding the myriad factors influencing athletic success. By focusing on the analysis of Olympic Games performance, the site aims to go beyond merely providing a central location for medal counts - although one can spend hours looking at this data alone. It seeks to utilize economic tools to explore and analyze how socio-economic factors impact sports achievements.

​Through this lens, economists can offer valuable insights into how macroeconomic data—such as GDP, income equality, and public investment in sports—affect a nation's athletic performance. This comprehensive approach will help uncover the broader socio-economic dynamics at play in the world of sports.

What factors are important to make and create great athletes?

Becoming a world-class athlete is often perceived as the result of personal traits such as hard work, perseverance, training, talent, grit, and genetic predispositions. While these individual qualities undeniably contribute to athletic success, they are akin to the icing on the cake. The foundational layers of this metaphorical cake are built upon socio-economic factors that significantly influence an athlete's journey to the top.

First and foremost, the country in which an athlete is born plays a pivotal role. Research has shown a strong correlation between a nation's GDP and its population size with its international sports achievements, particularly in events like the Olympic Games. Wealthier countries tend to have more resources to invest in sports infrastructure, training facilities, coaching, and athlete development programs. This means that athletes from these nations often have better access to the high-quality training and support necessary to reach elite levels.

Moreover, countries with greater income equality often provide more equitable access to sports. In nations where material equality is valued, the emphasis on achieving excellence through meritocracy in athletics can outweigh the importance of wealth. This creates an environment where talent and ability are more likely to be recognized and nurtured, regardless of an athlete's socio-economic background. Conversely, in countries with significant income inequality, the costs associated with sports—such as travel leagues, private lessons, and specialized equipment—can create barriers that disproportionately affect children from lower-income households. These financial hurdles can prevent talented individuals from even entering the competitive sports arena. ​In a 2002 study of the factors that determine Olympic success at the country level, economists Andrew Bernard and Meghan Busse found that real GDP is the single best predictor of a country’s performance.

The importance of socio-economic factors

Gender and race both play crucial roles in determining opportunities in sports. In many societies, cultural and institutional biases can limit access to sports for women, girls, and racial minorities, affecting their chances of becoming world-class athletes. While strides have been made toward equality in sports, disparities still exist in terms of funding, media coverage, and societal support. These disparities can hinder the development of female athletes and athletes from marginalized groups, preventing them from reaching their full potential.
​
The wealth of an athlete's family is another significant factor. Children from affluent families are more likely to afford the costs associated with high-level training, travel, and participation in competitive events. They also have greater access to health care, nutrition, and recovery resources, all of which are critical for maintaining peak performance and preventing injuries. On the other hand, talented athletes from lower-income families may struggle to access these resources, limiting their potential.

The role of luck

Finally, it’s important to acknowledge the undeniable role of luck in achieving success. The influence of chance events—such as the timing of an athlete's peak performance aligning with major competitions, avoiding significant injuries, and finding the right mentors at pivotal moments—plays a crucial part in shaping careers. Influential economist Robert Frank emphasizes that luck and seemingly trivial initial advantages often have profound impacts on life outcomes, far more than most people realize. According to Frank, good fortune can cement paths to success that might otherwise seem unattainable. Despite the substantial evidence supporting the impact of luck, many continue to hold onto the misconception that success is solely a result of hard work and personal effort. This false belief can influence both individual decisions and broader political choices in ways that may not always be beneficial. Understanding and acknowledging the role of luck, alongside hard work, is essential for a more accurate and humane interpretation of success.

Why separate Summer and Winter Olympics?

As you explore the various graphs we have published you will notice that all of them are separated between the Summer and Winter Olympic Games. This is because there are fewer countries that participate in the Winter Olympics and there are fewer medals awarded at the Winter Olympics. In order to make the best comparisons we must separate the Summer and Winter Olympics. Imagine if they were not separated and you were to compare two countries and their worst performances, one country only participates in the Summer Olympics and the other participates in both. The country that only participates in the Summer Olympics is likely to have a higher medal count for their worst performance because more medals are awarded at the Summer Olympics. When Summer and Winter Olympic Games are separated, this isn't an issue because countries are compared fairly, on a level playing feild. 

---

The graph below shows the total number of Olympic medals awarded at each game.
Graph Help:

• To move between games, use the play button under the slider or use the dropdown box

In keeping with tradition, the medals are gold, silver and bronze.  approximately 36,600 medals that have been awarded since Athens 1896.